Paul Djupe, Ph.D.

PRRI Affiliated Scholar Paul A. Djupe is a political scientist at Denison University (Ph.D., Washington University in 1997), where he directs the Data for Political Research program. He specializes in religion and American politics, social networks, and political behavior. Dr. Djupe is the editor of the Religious Engagement in Democratic Politics series with Temple UP and was the editor of the APSA Politics & Religion journal. He is the author or editor of numerous articles and books, including Trump, White Evangelical Christians, and American Politics: Change and Continuity (2024, U Penn), The Full Armor of God: The Mobilization of Christian Nationalism in American Politics (2023, Cambridge), The Evangelical Crackup? The Future of the Evangelical-Republican Coalition (2019, Temple), the Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics & Religion (2020, Oxford), and The Political Influence of Churches (2009, Cambridge). His research interests include examining how religious communities provide political information and how members then use that information and how religious worldviews, such as Christian nationalism and apocalypticism, work to shape American public opinion and political behavior in unexpected ways. He blogs for various outlets, most regularly for religioninpublic.blog, which he co-founded.

Find him on Bluesky at @pauldjupe.bsky.social‬.

Works By Paul Djupe, Ph.D.

God Talk: Experimenting with the Religious Causes of Public Opinion, a volume examining whether and how religion influences public opinion, politics and candidates, is the just-released book co-authored by PRRI affiliated scholar Paul Djupe of

The path to comprehensive immigration reform appears to have been smoothed by the 2012 presidential election. It was widely perceived that the Republican Party’s tough stand on immigration, supporting a policy of “self-deportation,” limited their

After a sound defeat in the race for the White House, Republicans are still searching for answers about why their “most electable” presidential candidate lost and what if anything they should do differently going forward.

By design, presidential contenders face the significant challenge of cobbling and holding together constituencies of enormous diversity. Uniting Main Street and Wall Street, religious and secular, farm and factory has always posed problems for candidates,

Scroll to Top